- Tinderbox import – Thought condensr on Inspiring or distracting?
- Inspiring or distracting? | x28's new Blog on Top ten tools
- Depth, once again | x28's new Blog on #PLENK2010 Picking from Breadth, for Depth
- Top ten tools | x28's new Blog on Augmenting human intellect
- x28 on More online meetings, less short-distance flights
- About Links (6)
- CCK08 (30)
- CCK11 (5)
- CCK12 (1)
- change11 (15)
- Classification (8)
- Cognitive Styles (39)
- CritLit2010 (3)
- DALMOOC (3)
- E-resonance (2)
- EL30 (18)
- eLearning (8)
- Hypertext (4)
- Intuition (1)
- Knowledge (17)
- Knowledge management (17)
- Learning (19)
- Misc (9)
- Multimedia and Dictionaries (2)
- Multimedia and Encyclopaedias (3)
- Multimedia and Language (14)
- NRC01PL (2)
- OpenEdMOOC (6)
- OpenLearning19 (4)
- Personal Productivity (30)
- PIM (25)
- PLENK2010 (12)
- rhizo14 (9)
- Social software (11)
- Uncategorized (3)
- Usability (4)
- Visualization (40)
- Web (3)
Category Archives: Personal Productivity
Some tools come with plenty of pre-selected ‘sand moulds’ for our thought contents. Maybe for some users, such offers may function as an idea generator or a creative muse. For others (like me) they do not work.
My top 10 tools: 1. Notepad, 2. QuiteRSS, 3. Twitter, 4. Condensr.de, 5. Wordpress, 6. Evernote, 7. gRSShopper, 8. FedWiki, 9. Diigo, 10. Slack
Responding to this: “What is Digital Literacy? — What impact does digital literacy have on your personal, professional, and spiritual* life? (*However you interpret this.) — Who are you? (context matters) — Licenses”
I knew that gRSShopper is able to harvest RSS feeds, but it is much more powerful than that.
Seven habits make my workflow satisfying. In particular: pull over push, optimized for browse rather than search, and careless capturing but cultivating later. Continue reading
I understand now better how the “magic” of my tool works: it makes associations tangible. It turns elusive mental relationships into “hands on” experience, and it compensates for the abstractness of some thought links, with a drawn line “at our fingertips”.
Comparing two other think tools with my own tool one can say that they are rather suited as the big long-term storage “cupboard” while my own tool is more like the “table” where things are put for a temporary large overview.
While I have often argued for Cmapping and against simple hierarchical mindmapping, there are benefits that mitigate the inherent problem of such
nested hierarchies, They may help capturing the structure of a talk while listening.
Good news from Cmap: there are now ways to avoid two stubborn behaviors of the application: No more forced proposition texts, and arrow-heads even if arrows slope downwards. But the bad news is that doubleclicking on my cmaps doesn’t work any more, so I have to roll back to the old version.