More gRSShopper

I have played quite a lot with gRSShopper because I like it.

Result 1

One result is a list of Stephen Downes’s articles, by categories:

I still have not found how I can use the categories table for the optlist in the entry form.

Result 2

I am rather proud of the next result,

that allows you to Display a gRSShopper List or add to a Condensr Map (Condensr is my own think tool). The sample data used is the same as in a previous blog post.

First, this is a gRSShopper page

and the Javascript is,
the demo version of my free Java program.

It is called from another page

[<a href="<st_cgi>page.cgi?x28cat=[*x28cat_id*]">List</a>]
[<a  href="[*x28cat_id*]&format=condensr" target="_map">Map</a>] [*x28cat_cat*]<br />

on the same server (to avoid a CORB problem), but I was not able to
use the <st_cgi> tag again because I don’t have https where the javascript
comes from, due to an old plan.

This page, in turn, points to a view called x28cat_condensr:

<admin x28cat,[*x28cat_id*]>
<keyword db=x28text;cat=[*x28cat_cat*];format=condensr;sort=crdate DESC;>

and a view called x28text_condensr

[*x28text_title*]    [*x28text_excerpt*]

(with a tab in between), and such tab-separated lists (label TAB detail)
are the input that can be dragged and dropped onto my canvas.

Five pictures

To understand gRSShopper better, I made the 5 pictures, according to Christina Wodtke’s 5 models

  • “Mind Maps, to gather your thoughts
  • Concept Maps, to organize your understanding
  • System Maps, to map the system (a tautology, but an accurate one)
  • Mental Models, to understand and communicate your user’s understanding
  • Concept models, to message a way to think about a complex system”

(which I had also done her for my own tool).

Concept model

Mental model

System map

Concept map


The mindmap’s content (without the cross connections) is better readable here:


  • elided benefits of RSS
    • harvested in the background
    • decentralized
      • no hub needed
      • no gatekeeper
      • no patronizing
    • pull, not push
      • less incentive for loud voices
    • no stream enforced
      • less context-switching
      • less built-in confusion
        • no need for recommendations
      • more room for infrequent writers
    • no tracking and privacy abuse
  • full workflow
    • aggregate
    • organize
    • publish
      • even distribute
  • incredibly powerful common interface
    • for common tasks
      • many channels in & out
      • many shipped examples
    • for custom tables
    • even for system tables
      • sometimes scary
  • emerged from practice
    • proven & very effective
    • many subtle accelerators
      • need time to appreciate
    • continuously improved
      • perpetual beta?
    • tailored & biased
      • courageous ‘under the engine hood’
      • specialities for large audiences
  • beyond consumption
    • handy for involvement
      • annotate/ refine/ put in context
      • bookmark/ share/ tag
    • convenience for making
      • comment or cite
      • curate or compile
      • write
    • beyond page impressions
      • pre-process the incoming
      • store resource meta-info


This entry was posted in Personal Productivity. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.