Atomic concepts?

The LAK conference seems to be fascinating, and I was pleased to hear about a new approach to learning styles in this post (via @gsiemens). But

“measure learning outcomes at the atomic concept level”

sounds strange. If they focus on individual items, will they find what lies in between, in the connectivist connections involving their concepts? And is there a chance for emergent learning to be discovered in the (empty?) space between the atoms?

This entry was posted in 42, Learning. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.