Subscribe
Thanks for your interest. I have a database table filled from RSS files over time. When you need all titles…
Thanks for sharing this. I really need to do something like it. On your contents page, did you enter all…
Thank you Jenny for the link. Thank you Bruno and Lisa for the interesting connections which I had not thought…
Apologies on my comment: I meant the *left* brain is focused on dates, while the *right* on contexualization!
Categories
Archives
May 2022 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Blogroll
- Bloug
- Bruce Landonβs Weblog for Students
- cck08: Bill
- cck08: Carmen
- cck08: Heli
- cck08: Jenny
- cck08: John
- cck08: Keith
- cck08: Lisa
- cck08: Maru
- cck08: Rodd
- cck08: Roy
- cck08: Viplav
- Connectivism Blog
- e-Denkarium
- Eide Neurolearning Blog
- elearnspace
- Half an Hour
- How to Save the World
- Ingrid Dethloff
- Knowledge Jolt with Jack
- Knowledge-at-work
- Mathemagenic
- Max VΓΆlkel
- MProve
- Rashmiβs Blog
- rhizo14: Christina
- rhizo14: Heather
- rhizo14: Jaap
- rhizo14: Jim
- rhizo14: Keith
- rhizo14: Mariana
- rhizo14: Sarah
- rhizo14: Vanessa
- Seblogging
- sharp observations, wild guesses et cetera
- Stephenβs Web ~ OLDaily
- Tonβs Interdependent Thoughts
- Toolblog
- Transforming Communication
- ZERO SECONDE
Category Archives: 52
Science Denial
Book by Sinatra & Hofer. A different picture of science. Continue reading
Gaps
Know more, or convince this audience?
Continue reading
Cmaps and the “Split Attention Effect”
The “Split Attention Effect” from Cognitive Load Theory demands that an annotation needs to be close to the item it refers to. I wonder if this is still true if the annotation can be reached by a saccadic eye movement.
Continue reading
Myths, semi-myths etc.
I bought Clark Quinn’s new book about training myths, semi-myths and misconceptions, and I can whole-heartedly recommend this exciting, in-depth, clinical and precise work. Continue reading
What counts as effectiveness?
If measuring the ‘effectiveness’ is mainly about traditional criteria such as knowledge content and storing it safely away, it will be very unbalanced. Measuring OERs, by contrast, offers the opportunity to try out and define new criteria.
Continue reading
Posted in 52, OpenEdMOOC
5 Comments
First approximation?
Why is the denial of brain lateralization so grim, piqued and emotional? The very idea that there are different modes, may be unsettling. The complacency that there is just one right way (and of course this is mine) may be threatened. Furthermore, the notion of two hemispheres suggests that the two modes are equitable.
Continue reading
Posted in 52, Cognitive Styles
2 Comments
#change11 Scholars’ network, group, and personal practices
Week 33 Task 4.
Continue reading
Posted in 52
3 Comments
#PLENK2010 Assessment as Proxy
I like Stephensβs notion that tests are used as proxies. It is consistent with the notion that learning works indirectly, by induction rather than by transmission.
Continue reading
Posted in 52, PLENK2010
4 Comments
Peer review before or after publication
why are Web2.0 affordances not embraced for scholarly communication? A new report from UC Berkeley gives a shattering answer and a discouraging advice to young scholars. Perhaps there is hope that older scholars and elite universities can be more broad-minded?
Continue reading
Posted in 52, Social software
Leave a comment
CCK08 Week 12: Research, Evaluation
I think the most urgent research need in Connectivism is not to gain still more insights but to develop a conceptual arsenal, or toolbox, for expressing and proving these findings.
Continue reading
Posted in 52, CCK08
3 Comments
Thanks! I do love having a system.