CCK08 Meta notes

Many speculations about the different participation styles have been written and already been interpreted for criticism. Since Stephen explicitly asked (why not subscribing), I want to give answers for my own case.

I did not know in advance if I would be among the many of the 2000 who just wanted to look at the massive spectacular and then drop. As I wrote in my introductory expectation I estimated two weeks of staying for me. So you may count me as the opposite of one who dropped unexpectedly: I stayed unexpectedly, at least till today.

Lisa’s description at Kenkat suggests that this first phase of massive interest, hype and “running around” can be viewed as clearly separated from the subsequent rest, and so I count this finished phase as a massive success.

But I probably don’t even count to the 2200+ because I never managed to subscribe the Daily by email (somehow I got lost in the registration forms when associating my OpenID credentials with my Email address). But that’s no problem. In fact, there were (and still are) even more technical “teething troubles”, and in spite of everything the second phase is still very successful. Minor problems still seem to exist with the update of the “Posts” page (which dutifully stopped at a post of Oct 1st that contained a picture of a large “stop” sign), and with the update of the feed list and the OPML file. All this could not stop the momentum of participation. In fact, people seem to don’t even notice these minor problems and, for example, Jenny’s blog is well visited without ever being centrally announced.

Participation cannot be measured by contributions to the forums. I wrote in week 2 that I don’t like their style. But even if I did, I would not subscribe because my inbox has changed its role quite a lot since my first email in 1984, and I recommend to the Moodle course creators at our university that they use the forced subscription type only for the out-of-the-box “News forum” for emergency notifications such as “class cancelled due to sickness”.

Well, I never contribute to the live sessions. As I wrote after week 2, the synchronous discussions are simply too fast for my ESL knowledge. (Let me take the occasion to thank all readers for their patience with my bumpy language!) And unlike Sia, I don’t feel uncomfortable with this constraint, because synchronous tasks have never been my preference.

Another mitigating factor for me is that I don’t get graded and so I can be more sloppy with doing my assignments. (But even if I was graded, I think I would not strive for a good mark. At my own school, we were ambitious to pass with a minimum of unvoluntary effort, except one of us who aimed for a limited access major. So all this overrating of assessments seems somewhat alien to me, anyway.)

All these factors should be considered before speaking of “failing”.

This entry was posted in CCK08. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to CCK08 Meta notes

  1. Keith Lyons says:


    Ich bin aus Australia und kann nur ein bischen Deutsch schreiben. Es freut mich sehr diese “Blog Post” zu lesen.

    Es ist (CCK08) genau fur mich auch.

    Danke sehr


    Jetzt auf Englisch


    I enjoyed this meta post very much. Like you my participation is voluntary and I can make choices. Your mind maps sent me on a journey of reflection and encouraged me to think about the richness of German to enlighten discussions about education.



  2. jim2 says:

    When learner autonomy is encouraged and the individual is empowered to consider his or her own learning preferences and directions, it is unfair to label their progress as failing. Unexpected may be more accurate and appropriate. Failing or passing won’t truly be evident until the course conclusion…and even then, the student is the ultimate judge of his or her progress.

  3. Sonia says:

    Hi Mathias
    I again agree with your thoughts. For me lurking is my way of learning especially in such a big course where I find it difficult to establish ties with participants. Also,I feel I need more time to process all information and to be honest I’m still reading articles about Chaos and Complexity, because I’m really interested in that. I’m very behind schedule but I don’t mind because although I am into the topic, I have a life, I have duties and I have to establish priorities. But the great thing is that all information is online and I could continue learning well beyond the end of the course.

  4. x28 says:

    Thank you very much, Keith, Jim, and Sonia! You confirm to me that everybody has their own style. I would not have Sonia’s patience to catch up but I would rather skip sections because I am curious to follow what others are writing right now. And Keith’s great stacks are the ideal complementary “Weekly” to the Daily.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.